Monday, October 27, 2008

Porn Star Jack Venice Guilty On Rape Charges


Jury took less than 3 hours to convict Christopher Reid:

A sleazy 26-year-old porn star has been convicted of rape after police had accused him of doing just that to a Washington State University sorority member back in September of 2007.

Pullman police originally had taken in WSU student Kyle Schott, 23, on September 14th, 2007 as a suspect in the attack.

While being questioned, Schott confirmed to them that a second accomplice in the attack was porn star Christopher Jack Reid, 26, who often went by the name "Jack Venice" in his videos.

A spokesman for the department stated at the time that Reid had come to Pullman and subsequently met Schott at a local bar there.

Later as the night progressed, prosecutors say the two got drunk and broke into several sororities in search of women (sluts) to co-star in Reid's (trailer park) porn films.

Apparently they never found one, so instead I guess they decided to lower the bar even further. During their drunken stupor, they apparently hatched the sick plan to rape a sleeping woman.

Unfortunately for both morons, the Kappa Alpha Theta member awoke to find the two in her room assaulting her.

They fled the scene and she immediately contacted police.

Kyle Schott, who had already plead guilty earlier this year, testified against Reid during his trial and the victim identified Reed in the court room as one of the attackers. As a matter of fact, it only took the jury three hours to convict him of rape.

He could face up to life in prison when he is scheduled to be sentenced in December.

Anyway, I've been reporting on this case for awhile over at the forum here. I had actually forgotten about it until just now.

It's interesting because Reid's first "film" was entitled, "Sexual Predators 2", of course I'm sure it's not quite as great as the original classic, but I guess this does makes him one hell of a method actor, huh?

At least he has that going for him anyway...

UPDATE: Reid sentenced to life in prison

25 comments:

  1. wow, you're a dumb individual. it only took the "bias" jury members under 3 hours because they were already biased from the sight of him and the fact that he was a porn star. it's also funny how they didn't even do a rape kit on the girl. that is supposed to be standard procedure for apparent rape victims. also, when you said she awoke to find them assaulting her, or whatever you said, that wasn't accurate. she woke up and saw that there were 2 men in her room and they walked out. even if she did get raped in her sleep, she just woke up and probably didn't get a good look at the "attackers." again, why didn't they do a rape kit on the girl? i wonder who selected the jury? also, that was funny how you said he's a great method actor, since i'm getting ready to study that for the next 2 years in santa monica. honestly though, it seems like you hate this guy prior to this even coming about. maybe you like hanna hilton and are jealous of him being with her, i know i was. after hearing his interview and reading other articles from different viewpoints, i came to the conclusion this guy has earned my respect. if he's innocent, but has been found guilty and could face 13 years to life, he has to have the best composure. i don't know what i would do if i was in his situation having a girl accuse me of something i didn't do and there wasn't any substantial proof to back her claims up. it just shows how corrupt the legal system is and how if there was a god, how could he let something like this happen to an innocent person. yeah i think he's more innocent than the girl who supposedly got violated because sorority girls aren't the smartest and they are almost always sluts. he at least served in the iraq war. i don't know all the facts, but i do know this case was biased and unfair, completely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes it is unfair and they can not lock someone up if there isnt a rape test done on the victim who is saying it happened its bs and i know he was told to admit it and he wouldnt get as long of a time compared to what he would have gotten if he didnt admit it ... people are fucking horrible... the only ones who know if it happened or not is the lord above and him himself..

      Delete
    2. @chris wade Jesus Christ, dude. Your level of moronic contradiction is sky bound. You state for certain that this guy is innocent. Claim a jury to be biased. Claim not just a potential rape victim who was sleeping in her locked room, but an entire age group of females as sluts. You're absolutely deluded. I have no idea what your motivations are towards this guy's innocence. Sounds like you're sexually motivated. Don't let obsession get in the way of facts. He had more than enough money to prove that he didn't rape her. He obviously did it. You even doubted your assertions towards the end of your message. And fuck the soldiers that go to Iraq. They're not heroes. They haven't saved the US from any immediate danger. All they've done is occupy another country to steal oil and to maim innocent people. US soldiers are committing crimes like cowards and getting medalled for that stuff. Fuck the foreign policy - dictating the world's resources and rights to save the US dollar and interests. Fascist cunts.

      Delete
  2. I think your blog is necessary and relevant for every one who uses social media on the Internet ... and for people like "Chris Wade" who only know how to skim the fat, I'm surprised he has such a prolific knowledge of date rape provisions, yet can't fathom an argument for the article that makes sense. The misogynistic attack merits the "chauvinistic pig" retort in return.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank You. Sadly, I get stupid comments and e-mails like that all the time. The victim is a "slut", "had it coming" or "deserved it".

    I have no idea who these people are but they dwell on the Internet and have for years now.

    It's a dark place out there...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Inappropriate touching" is not rape. He certainly isn't a saint. If it was my sister, I would take a ball bat to his head. However, you cannot call him a rapist. Shame on the girl for calling what happened "rape".

      Delete
  4. Why would he have to rape someone? He gets laid all the time in his job. Freakin moron.

    ReplyDelete
  5. how long was his sentenced?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't know. He was supposed to have been officially sentenced on Friday. But I can't find an article regarding that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be 9 to life...

      Delete
  7. I laughed at the hypocrisy of Cris Wade...If he says that they only judged him guilty because he was a porn star wahhh wahhh wahh..then he procedes to say that most sorority girls are sluts...He's doing the EXACT same thing he was whining was done to a porn star that he "respects" PLEASE, get new role models..why didn't he STAY in something noble like the military? Now he's reduced to TROLLING for women adn ASKING them for sex...Please

    PATHETIC.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I couldn't have worded it better myself Jenn. I completely agree.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I just wanted to point about how moronic so many people are when they claim someone 'wouldn't have to' rape someone because they can get women to sleep with them. That is totally besides the point. Yes, rape is a sexual crime, but it's also about violence and control. Just because someone can get some women to sleep with them, doesn't mean they can get any woman to sleep with them. If rape was about not being able to get laid, they're be a lot of nerdy computer geeks raping away.

    ReplyDelete
  10. bob makes a good point. Rape is not sex it's a violent crime. It's unfortunate how the porn industry has been stigmatized in American society, and even worse that the industry is often blamed for rape and other forms of violence. I wouldn't be surprised if his professional career was at least part of the jury's deciding factor in his fate.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Chris Wade was wrong when he said this guy Jack was in the Iraqi War. The criminal Jack Venice was in the Marine Corp and KICKED OUT because he has issues with authority and discipline.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Chris was convicted of second degree rape and first degree burglary at Kappa Alpha Theta Sorority. He was also convicted of two residential burglaries for Pi Beta Phi and Delta Gamma sororities. All convictions do not have any evidence to back them up. DNA testing from the victim’s body was inconclusive with the sample possibly coming from any one in three Americans. The rape exam of the victim was also inconclusive, mainly because the victim was menstruating at the time so trauma could not be determined. No evidence of Chris was found in the accuser’s room nor could it be determined that he was in that building.
    For the residential burglaries one has to understand the definition of such. According to the Washington State Legislature, “a person is guilty of residential burglary if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, the person enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling other than a vehicle.” There is no evidence that Chris entered these sororities with the intent to commit crime, there is no evidence that he did either. When asked to leave he left. The prosecution only provided speculation, mainly based on Chris’s occupation in the adult film industry, which was mentioned over 200 times, surmising that Chris was looking for sex. His career is irrelevant to the case but the prosecution was still allowed to use it. The reasoning appears to be that because he was an adult film actor, he was more likely to be someone attempting to find sex, which in turn raises the likelihood that he could rape someone. This is equal to ridiculous claims that because many games are violent many gamers are likely to be too.
    The accuser’s testimony during the trial is not very likely. During the trial, her statements were at least her third version of the alleged crime. Her original statement to police was that she was suddenly awakened by a noise but wasn’t sure what it was. When she looked around she saw two men in her room but she could not see their faces in the dark. One man she described was wearing a white shirt while the other was wearing a maroon shirt, khaki cargo shorts, and a hat with longish brown hair. This contradicts her statement during the trial where she now could positively identify her attackers and that Chris was one of them. She claims that she could see Chris clearly and that he had his pants down. She states that she could see his legs clearly and saw nothing on them to remember. Chris has a bullet bandolier tattoo on his left thigh, no one could miss it. I bit odd don’t you think?
    Kyle’s testimony against Chris is not credible due to that fact he was found lying to investigators multiple times. Kyle claims that Chris was there and about to initiate sex. Kyle stated that he was improperly touching her but nothing else. There is a problem with his story, and it complements the same problem with the accuser’s testimony during the trial.
    Witnesses who saw Chris and Kyle described both to be wearing white shirts. If the accuser saw both Chris and Kyle, as Kyle also claims, then she would have seen two men in white shirts. NOT ONE. If it’s Chris then who was the man in the maroon shirt? It can’t be Kyle because he was also wearing a white shirt. This is where evidence plays a vital role. It was proven that Kyle was in that building and in the victim’s room. Police found missing sunglasses from the sorority and a condom rapper found in her room had his fingerprints. So logically, the man in the white shirt the victim saw in her room was Kyle. Who then was the man in the maroon shirt? Unknown, the prosecution focused on Chris throughout the trial. For his testimony against Chris, Kyle received a plea deal of 13 months. Chris’s convictions are unjustifiable with such a lack of evidence and the punishment for 9 to life is heinous.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The jury took three hours to deliberate not because the evidence was overwhelming, rather, because there was no evidence to deliberate on. The prosecution provided only theory and no concrete evidence. I can’t fathom what that jury was thinking when they decided to convict Chris.
    After the accuser changed her story to that one of the men was blond, the prosecution showed her a picture montage of 10 suspects. Chris was the only blond shown, all others had darker hair. This can only be seen as extreme bias and I would say unethical. The judge did admit that this was unfair but did not make any objections and from what I’ve read the defense attorney didn’t either.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A you are a kid loool... you only reply to those that lick ur fucked-up ass.

    Didi you read what chris wade and gemini wrote? did you reply?? NO! cos ur ass wasn't being licked ey?

    I have read and seem artifacts pertaining to this case and this guy (irrespective of his profession) is innocent and fucked up retards like you and your ass lickers are striving to make his case unheard.

    You know what --- Go rape yourself!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am no fan of this Venice character, but reading about this conviction, it sounds like a miscarriage of justice. Even if guilty, punishment is too severe since white collar crimes go unpunished or country club prisons. Pro athletes seem to get away with rape. $$$ is what talks in US justice system. This dude is guilty of robbery and the sexual assault seems iffy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know if it's a typo when you said he "is" guilty of robbery but I would still like to point out that no evidence supports that he robbed anyone. Chris (Jack Venice) was accused of burglary over a beer helmet and a can of coke from two separate sororities. Both items, which were presented in court, never left their respective properties nor did they have his fingerprints on them. No witnesses saw him touch them either. At most he could be accused for trespassing but since he left when asked and that neither sorority called police I don’t believe it would be worthwhile. One witness said in court if it wasn’t for the accusation of rape she would have never called the incident in saying that she saw no harm in him being there and thought he was another prankster as Chris claimed to be. Furthermore, his fingerprints were not found in either Pi Beta Phi or Delta Gamma.

      The rape charge is more than just “iffy” because again there is no evidence to support the claim. The rape exam came back negative, his fingerprints were not found on the condom rapper left at the scene or anywhere else within Kappa Alpha Theta sorority, and according to the victim’s original statement she never saw him. Three separate forensic analysts after looking at the DNA evidence question if Chris could even be a minor contributor to the sample found on the condom rapper and claim that the testimony from the forensic analyst at the trial, Ms. Turpin, was biased which could have likely lead to prejudice amongst the jury. While it is clear that the victim and Kyle Schott contributed to the sample the same cannot be said for Chris, but Ms. Turpin said that all three were potential contributors. Grouping Chris along with the victim and Schott could have confused the jury according to the other analysts who say that Chris’s DNA is undetectable or masked. One analyst points out that if Chris is to be even considered a potential contributor then a fourth contributor must be added because DNA not belonging to the victim, Schott, or Chris was found. This is the much needed evidence that Chris’s defense relies on.

      There is about five occasions that allude to a third unknown male being present. Witnesses claim they saw a man in a green shirt or a man not fitting Chris’s description at the “beer-pong house,” Pi Beta Phi sorority, Alpha Gamma Rho fraternity, Delta Delta Delta sorority, and Kappa Alpha Theta sorority.

      There is much more I could go on about but if you want to know more I suggest you check out udontnojack.com. The site contains much of the discovery package but some of the information I obtained from the actual trial transcripts.

      Delete
  16. Cocaine is juan Hellof a DRUG!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. If you want to read the FACTS about my brothers... YES HE IS MY KIN... case just go to www.udontnojack.com and read.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is a freaking weird case. This wouldn't qualify as date rape. They should have done a kit. With as little evidence as they had, 3 hours is pretty brief. And LIFE sentence when we can't even get horrific proven rape sentences that long.Weird.But then again, this is Eastern Washington, the west coast's equivalent of the Deep South, but worse because they don't know and own it. When someone is begging for a new trial and there's that little evidence, ya gotta give them one. The system broke here.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Welcome to the real world, minorities have had to deal with this so called justice system for generations, the American court system is definitely biased or let's put it this way, Kennedy got away with a lot worse than what this young man was accused of,and with more evidence too,chances are if you are poor and /or black you'll be more likely to be railroaded, the central park jogger case is a prime example. I don't know all the details of the case but from what I've read so far it definitely is alarming, to go to jail for life on such scanty evidence? welcome to America, land of the free (unless you are poor, black or a porn star)

    ReplyDelete
  20. This case was railroaded in an ugly Eastern Washington (essentially bass-ackwards Idaho) manner befitting of the West Memphis Three. This is a travesty of a case. Who in the hell gets life imprisonment for "maybe-rape-in-sleep" with no rape exam, and sketchy ID of him. No, they fell on Schott, a coward who saw an opportunity to dodge resonsibility by blaming the THIRD man in their party. Someone he just met, but who has a career that will guarantee an overzealous prosecutor a conviction with the ignorant Eastern Washington folks. I left there because its impossible to evade prejudicial crap like this case. It offends me that I hail from there.

    ReplyDelete

Random Posts



    Get Updates In Your E-Mail Inbox







    Label Cloud

    Blog Archive